What is Web 2.0, Definition, Design & Principles
Web 2.0 is referred the the second stage of development of the internet mainly led by Google, characterized especially by the change from static web pages to dynamic or user-generated content and the growth of social media.
In the words of Martin, he is more leaning to the techno-cultural side of the phenomenon, nut sufficiently covered by the otherwise very good wikipedia-entry. At present He sees five characteristics of the Web 2.0 infrastructure, or Web 2.0 applications:
The Web as a Platform
Web 2.0 sees the Web as a platform, rather than just a collection of websites.
- In Web 1.0, people mainly used web browsers to visit and read websites.
- In Web 2.0, the Web can be used by different devices, applications, and services, such as mobile phones, televisions, search engines, and computer programs.
- Web 2.0 applications can provide information without necessarily showing a traditional web page.
- The “client” can be a browser, a background computer program, or even a person who creates and shares new content.
- Information can be exchanged and reused through technologies such as XML.
Web 2.0 turns the Web into a platform where different devices, programs, and people can create, share, and use information.
Point of Presence
A Point of Presence means having a presence on the Web where people or programs can access and share online services and information.
The idea of using the Web has changed over time:
- Web 1.0: People mainly visited websites to read information.
- Web 1.5: Websites such as Amazon and eBay became more interactive. Users could search, buy, sell, and interact.
- Web 2.0: Users become much more actively involved in the online environment. They can create, share, and interact with content.
The Web changed from a place we simply visited into an interactive environment in which we participate.
Microcontent-Based
Web 2.0 is based on microcontent, which means small pieces of information or content that can be easily shared, combined, and reused.
Examples include:
- Blog posts
- Comments
- Tags
- Photos
- Short videos
- Tweets/posts
- Reviews
Instead of thinking of the Web as a collection of separate pages and documents, Web 2.0 sees it more like a constantly changing cloud of information.
This makes the Web:
- Open – information can be accessed and shared.
- Decentralized – information does not come from one central source.
- Bottom-up – ordinary users can create content.
- Self-organizing – content can organize itself through tags, links, ratings, and user activity.
Web 2.0 is made up of small pieces of content that users can create, share, connect, and organize.
Second-Order Content / Metacontent
Web 2.0 often takes content from different sources, processes it using computers, and then reuses or combines it in a new way.
For example:
Information from several websites → collected by an application → processed → combined → presented to users in a new form.
This is sometimes called second-order content because it is content created from other content.
For example, a website might collect information from different sources and display it together rather than creating all the information itself.
Web 2.0 can take information from many places, process it, combine it, and create new useful information from it.
The Metaweb
The idea of the Metaweb is closely related to the Semantic Web.
The goal is to make information on the Web easier for both computers and humans to understand, connect, and organize.
Web 2.0 combines things such as:
- Social networking
- Blogs
- Wikis
- Tags
- User-generated content
- Online communities
Users can add tags to content. These tags help connect related information.
For example, someone might tag an article with:
Technology→Web 2.0→Social Media
These tags help people and computer systems understand how different pieces of information are related.
Web 2.0 also allows users to collect and organize information according to their own interests.
In simple words:
The Metaweb connects information from different sources and helps both people and computers find, understand, organize, and use that information.
| Features of Web 2.0 | Explanation |
|---|
| Web as a Platform | The Web is a platform for creating and sharing information and services. |
| Point of Presence | Users don’t just visit websites; they actively participate in them. |
| Microcontent | The Web consists of small pieces of content that can be shared and combined. |
| Second-Order Content | New information can be created by combining information from different sources. |
| Metaweb | Information is connected and organized so that both humans and computers can use it more effectively. |
Characteristics of Web 2.0 by Jeff Clavier
According to Jeff Clavier Web 2.0 is, three characteristics are included in Web 2.0: openness of data and services, rich user experience and low cost of delivery.
- Openness of data and services, to contrast with closed data silos that still exist today (Amazon reviews/recommendations, eBay reputation).
- Rich user experience, based on technology providing increased interactivity (Ajax, Ruby,…) and clever remix/combinations of numerous services (maps, photos, calendar, lists,…) that free the developers from building infrastructure and focus on the user and its needs. I found that Trulia is a great example of such rich user experience, providing instant gratification upon the first use (Disclosure: I have no relationship with Trulia).
- Low cost of delivery, as I have written/talked about many times over, this new generation of applications is
builtbootstrapped on $50K to $100K tops (provided that the founding team pays itself very little). From there, the odds are that:- a few will hit it big (or even huge)
- some of these companies will reach profitability relatively quickly and have their options open, but it is not clear how far they will scale
- others will have very decent exits with one of the GEYAMA club after taking in just a minimal investment $$$
- a number will be rolled up into other Web 2.0 startups during a (necessary) consolidation
- the rest… well… will stagnate, fade away and eventually disappear. But because of the limited working capital requirements, a consolidation might take a long time to effect.
Note that these scenario can be applied to any startup, and the only difference here is the limited requirement on capital intake. Which led to my “closing” remark, that I was not sure how the usual VC economics will work out in this otherwise fascinating space.
